In a move to boost renewable-energy generation in Colorado,
Gov. John Hickenlooper on Wednesday signed a controversial bill doubling the
renewable-energy target for rural electric cooperatives.
"No question that the country as a whole is looking
for, wanting cleaner fuels," Hickenlooper said.
The governor said, however, the bill was
"imperfect" and issued an executive order to review its most
contentious issues: the compliance deadline and the cost.
The new law requires cooperatives to supply 20 percent of
electricity from renewable sources by 2020. They had been facing a 10 percent
requirement by 2020.
"The 20 percent by 2020 is imminently doable,"
said John Nielsen, energy-program manager for the environmental-policy group
Western Resource Advocates.
"We are seeing many utilities adding 300 to 500
megawatts of renewables in the space of five years," Nielsen said.
The difference is that the rural co-op system does not have
the natural-gas fired plants or transmission lines to balance renewable energy,
said Kent Singer, executive director of the Colorado Rural Electric
Association.
"Twenty percent by 2020 is an impossibility,"
Singer said.
The bill, SB 252, was one
of the most hotly contested of the legislative session, pitting
environmental groups and renewable-energy companies against rural cooperatives
and Republican lawmakers.
"The bill was deeply flawed, and the best approach
would have been to veto it and for us to come back and work collaboratively to
find a compromise," said Lee Boughey, a spokesman for the Tri-State
Generation and Transmission Association.
Tri-State, which provides wholesale power to 18 rural
cooperatives and serves about 20 percent of Colorado, opposed
the bill, saying it could cost up to $3 billion.
Meeting the goal would primarily fall to Tri-State, which
provides 95 percent of the electricity sold by its member co-ops, and the
Intermountain Rural Electric Association.
Under the new law, the cost of meeting the goal is capped at
a 2 percent charge on bills, doubling the current renewable-energy cap.
But Boughey said exactly what falls under that cap and what
doesn't is not clear.
"Senate Bill 252 will cost the average farm family
thousands of dollars in higher energy costs," state Rep. Jerry Sonnenberg,
R-Sterling, said in a statement.
Hickenlooper
rejected such forecasts Monday.
"When we sat down and really looked at it, the average
cost to customers was about $2" a month, Hickenlooper said.
The additional cost for farm irrigation ranged from $10 to
$40 a month, the governor said.
"In the end, this will be better for consumers,
offering more predictable costs than old fossil fuels," said Peter
Maysmith, executive director of the environmental group Conservation Colorado.
Many of the still-fractious issues will be reviewed by an
advisory committee, Hickenlooper said.
The committee will look into whether the 2020 target is
reasonable and whether the "2 percent cap is defensible and
realistic," the governor said. "That people aren't going have to
endure hidden costs and charges."
The committee, overseen by the Colorado Energy Office and
including representatives from rural electricity utilities, the
renewable-energy industry and environmental groups, will make a report in six
months.
"The co-ops were not consulted on the executive order
and the advisory committee," Tri-State's Boughey said. "We are
reviewing the order issue to understand its purpose and implications."
The governor said the law could be modified in the next
legislative session if it needs to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment