Last month former Texas Governor and new Energy Secretary Rick Perry
tasked his staff with looking at America's power grid. Secretary Perry wants to
know how federal policies are impacting energy sources that are vital for
ensuring the grid's long-term reliability, resilience and affordability. Recently,
I wrote that Perry is asking the right question. As the governor who
oversaw the transformation of Texas into a wind power leader, Perry is going to
like what his staff finds.
Here's why. In his memo,
Secretary Perry laid out three critical yardsticks he wants to assess with his
60-day review. I will offer my take on each of these — from a wind industry
perspective — in three columns leading up to our annual WINDPOWER conference in Anaheim,
Calif., on May 22-25.
Power Markets and Price
Perry’s first key metric is the marketplace. He wants to
know how policies and a changing fuel mix are changing wholesale electricity
markets.
It’s an important question because the business reality has
moved past decades-old assumptions about how the grid operated when it was
powered largely by coal, gas and nuclear.
But what has kept pace is the ability of the grid to adapt
to a different energy mix, with widespread switching from coal to gas, and the
addition of large amounts of economically competitive renewable energy.
Wind in particular is winning in the marketplace, because of
its proven grid reliability and market-beating cost. Wind power costs are
down 66
percent since 2009, as low-cost wind has joined low-cost natural gas
as a market leader.
Indeed, across much of the nation, wind is now
the cheapest source of new electric-generating capacity, attracting
utilities such as Xcel Energy and MidAmerican
Energy, and corporate buyers such
as Amazon, Google, Home Depot and GM.
And as wind has increased its market penetration almost
five-fold since 2008, overall U.S. wholesale power prices have dropped more
than 60 percent. That is no coincidence.
In fact, in 2016 wind exceeded hydro
as the No. 1 U.S. renewable energy in total capacity, enough to power
24 million homes. Wind capped a second
straight year at more than 8,000 MW installed and beat
both natural gas and solar in new U.S. utility-scale
capacity for 2015-2016 combined, according to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission.
The market has adapted and built up tremendous momentum
behind its lowest-cost energy sources. Today, customers' preferred U.S. energy
choices are wind, gas and solar, based on the latest levelized cost of energy
(LCOE), as reported by Lazard.
Not surprisingly, these three home-grown energy sources
accounted for more than 90 percent of new U.S. utility-scale electric-generating
capacity last year. And in the first quarter of 2017, the U.S. wind industry
installed nearly 1,000 new wind turbines, for its strongest 1Q since 2009.
Let the Marketplace Decide
Some may not like this new economic reality, but it remains
a reality nonetheless. And it's a reality that powers a workforce of more than
a half
a million U.S. jobs today, and well over a million U.S. workers in
years to come.
Federal and state policies have an important role in
encouraging innovation without excessive regulation, ensuring a level playing
field for competition based on price, eliminating barriers to entry and
connecting supply with demand centers, and enabling investment with a
predictable business environment.
Ultimately, however, it is up to the marketplace to decide
winners and losers, based on price.
Those who oppose wind power’s role in reducing prices are
arguing to turn back the clock to higher electricity costs for consumers and
businesses.
That’s not a winning proposition.
Excellent points. Except for the market stuff. Markets are easily manipulated. Fossil fuel supporters proved that a long time ago. You up to volunteer to oversee market operations and manipulations so renewables have a fair opportunity.
ReplyDelete