On 28 June 2017, an official bill amending the Renewable
Energy Sources Act and certain other acts (including the Act on Wind Farm
Investments), was published on the website of the Government Centre for
Legislation. One of the material amendments provided by the draft regards the
rules of real property taxation of wind power plants.
Under the bill, the definition of a construction structure
will return to the shape that was in force until 15 July 2016, which means that
it will be clearly stated that only the building part of a wind power plant is
a construction structure. Secondly, the appendix to the Building Law Act will
clearly state that only the building part of a wind power plant is a building
object (a construction structure is one of the building objects). Last, but not
least, the Act on Wind Farm Investments will clearly indicate that a wind power
plant consists of a building (a mast and foundation) and a technical part.
Taking into account the planned amendments, according the justification of the
bill, only the building part of a wind power plant will be subject to real
property taxation.
Entry into force
The bill foresees that it will come into force on 1
September 2017 (with minor exceptions, not pertaining to provisions influencing
real property taxation rules). According to the justification of the bill, the
planned amendments with respect to real property taxation will influence real
property taxation rules starting from 1 October 2017.
Our perspective
The planned amendments regarding real property taxation of
wind power plants are positive for the whole wind energy industry, as it is
clear that the aim of the bill is to lower the real property tax burden imposed
on wind farm investors. On the other hand, these amendments tend to confirm
that in fact the real property taxation rules that have been in force starting
from 1 January 2017, have indeed been amended in a manner leading to a very
significant increase of the yearly real property tax burden for wind farm
investors (and not just clarifying the interpretation doubts that have arisen
in the last months). As the shape of the bill is subject to further legislative
process, it is advisable to closely monitor amendments to the bill.
No comments:
Post a Comment