Not often is running the electric grid as simple as applying
lessons from childhood. Right now it is ─ California is learning to share with
its neighbors. A bill currently in front of the Legislature from California
Assemblymember Chris Holden, AB 813, aims to build a better trading platform to
share California’s extra solar power with nearby states like Oregon,
Washington, and Nevada, which would then share their extra wind, solar, and
hydropower resources with California.
It is like the lunch table you sat around as a kid – one
where you can trade that banana pudding that overflows at your house for one of
your neighbor’s chocolate chip cookies. It’s a delicious deal, where everybody
wins.
That deal just got better. Holden’s office recently released new
language which represents an important, positive step in the process
of creating a regional electric grid for the West. This includes key
requirements and protections to ensure a regional grid lowers harmful
greenhouse gas emissions and supports California’s climate and energy goals –
helping the state and its neighbors to move towards a low-carbon future.
Better sharing can improve grid management
California has more solar power available in the middle of
the day than the state can use, but not as many clean resources handy when the
sun is rising, setting, or at night. This leads to the need to develop “ramping
resources.” Often powered by natural gas, they can provide electricity at any
time, which is good. However, if we want to keep reducing our carbon and air
pollution from the electricity sector, we need to move away from relying on
fossil fuels in this way.
States like Oregon, Washington, and Nevada have different
resources, like hydropower and wind, available at different times of day.
Accessing these out-of-state resources makes a huge difference in California’s
ability to manage the electric grid and build more renewables.
California currently has some ability to share energy
resources with other states through the successful and popular Energy Imbalance Market (which,
according to recent EIM analytics, displaced nearly
69,000 metric tons of carbon in 2017, equivalent to taking nearly
15,000 cars off the road for a year). However, the amount of electricity we
can share is limited in this market, so it doesn’t fully expand our access to
clean resources in other states. To return to the lunch table analogy, our
current system is like having to arrange these deals from across the cafeteria,
trade across multiple tables, and give morsels away in the process.
What does the bill do?
AB 813 would seek to change all of that – it would enable us
to all to sit at the same table, so we can make our trades more directly. The
California Independent System Operator (CAISO) is our trading platform.
Currently, CAISO is governed by appointees from California, so no other states
want to join us – we won’t let them on our board. While that approach has worked
until now, in 2017 alone California
curtailed, or turned off, 345,524 megawatt hours of solar energy, enough to
power over
52,000 homes for a year. The Golden State now has to learn to share some of
this excess electricity with its neighbors.
The result of input from a large and diverse set of
stakeholders, including Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), this new bill
language incorporates important changes that protect state autonomy and ensures
California meets its climate and energy goals.
Specifically, AB 813 sets up the following:
- A structure that any regional grid operator, or trading platform, needs to have in order for California utilities to join.
- These include requirements for limiting conflicts of interest on the grid operator’s board, protecting the states’ policies from federal intervention and getting states’ input, providing for public participation, and ensuring California’s climate goals are met.
- A roadmap for how CAISO can evolve into a multistate entity, or a bigger table, through a public process at the California Energy Commission to ensure CAISO meets these requirements.
Still work to do
Stakeholders are currently working out many of the details,
including those listed above and some that do not even appear in the bill yet.
Unlike previous years, there is a robust process to address them.
Assemblymember Holden and his staff asked for stakeholder
input and printed a bill six months before the end of session – leaving ample
time to focus on resolving any issues. They are working hard to get this right,
and they should – we don’t want a school bully to take over the lunch table.
Having the right foundation in place will help prevent this from happening.
Yes, there are still issues to overcome. One is the loss of
the “buckets system” under California’s renewable portfolio standard – which
promotes the development of in-state clean energy. Another is related to
the overall effort by the environmental justice community to reduce pollution
from power plants in already burdened communities, an issue California should
review with or without a western regional electric grid. Luckily, the
substantial, inclusionary, and fair public process AB 813 is following this
year can handle these and other important issues.
A regional electricity grid is good news for California and
the West. It enables the Golden State to access more renewable resources –
because it allows us to share.
No comments:
Post a Comment