Poland’s upper house of parliament approved an amendment to
the renewable sources of energy law on Friday meant to remove obstacles to
green energy investment and help Warsaw meet EU renewable energy targets.
Poland’s conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party won the
2015 election partly with promises to sustain the traditional coal industry. In
2016, the government banned construction of new wind farms close to dwellings
and imposed new taxes on investors that made many wind farms loss-making.
It also took Poland off the track to meet an EU target of 15
percent of energy from renewables overall in gross final energy consumption -
with sub-targets including renewable electricity, green heat and transport - by
2020.
But as part of a wider plan to ease tensions with the EU,
which has criticized the PiS over its politicisation of the judiciary, and in
light of falling production of high-polluting coal, Poland changed direction
towards green energy this year.
In March the government proposed the amendment to remove the
tax disincentives and kick off auctions under a new subsidy system in which
renewable producers would be assured a stable price for their energy in any
given period.
“This is why we are doing the law...The intention is that we
come closer to this 15 percent. This 15 percent is at risk, but if we show that
we are getting closer then our actions will be positively assessed,” Deputy Energy
Minister Grzegorz Tobiszowski told lawmakers earlier this month.
According to the Polish Wind Energy Association (PWEA), a
non-government wind farm lobby group, Poland achieved 13.9 percent of
electricity consumption through renewables last year, short of a target of 14.7
percent.
“We are very glad about this bill and that it has taken into
account many of the industry’s proposals,” said PWEA chief Janusz Gajowiecki.
“The biggest positive element is the tax issue,” he said,
adding that more improvements to green energy rules would be welcome as the
situation with existing wind farms was critical.
The amendment is now subject to the president’s signature.
No comments:
Post a Comment