Worthington wants to shrink its residents’ electric bills —
and its carbon footprint — and city officials say Issue 39 can make that
happen.
If voters approve the issue on Nov. 6, the city would have
permission to go directly to energy suppliers to secure a bulk price that, when
divided among residents and small businesses, could lead to cheaper electric
bills.
The city says the agreement also would allow it to increase
its reliance on renewable energy.
Under Ohio law, residents can negotiate prices with energy
suppliers individually. But by turning thousands of residents into one large
“energy buyer,” the city, in theory, would have added leverage in negotiations
to ensure that the price people pay for their energy supply is lower.
Worthington has about 14,600 residents, according to a 2017 Census Bureau
estimate.
The bulk-buying approach is used by many municipalities and
counties in the state, especially in northeastern Ohio. In Franklin County,
Dublin and Reynoldsburg are the only cities registered with the Public
Utilities Commission of Ohio as energy aggregators. Four townships — Hamilton,
Madison, Prairie and Pleasant — also have programs.
Issue
39 was placed on the ballot after Worthington City Council approved it
in June. Councilman Scott Myers, the lone dissenting vote, said his opposition
was largely based on not yet fully understanding the day-to-day implications
for residents.
“I don’t want to make anyone’s life more complicated than it
already is,” he said. At this point, he said, he doesn’t believe the program
will do that.
An electric bill has two major components: the cost of
generating electricity, and the cost of delivering that energy to consumers.
The part that would change for Worthington residents is the
rate for power generation. Instead of consumers paying the default rate set by
the utility company — in this case, AEP Ohio — Worthington would attempt to
negotiate a lower rate with any of the 157 competitive retail electric-service
providers operating in Ohio.
Worthington also is committed to reducing its carbon
footprint, so the city will negotiate specifically with suppliers that provide
renewable energy to the grid, said Steve Gandee, the city’s finance manager.
Gandee, who has been tapped to answer residents’ questions
on the issue, said the goal is: “Get the best bang for our buck and get as
green as we can and still save the residents money.”
Residents would pay their monthly bill to AEP regardless of
what company is selected as the supplier. Residents can opt out of the program
at any time. Those who are already in agreements with other suppliers wouldn’t
immediately be eligible to enroll in the city’s program.
In his conversations with residents, Gandee said he hasn’t
heard much opposition, except for one person who didn’t want the government
deciding which energy supplier a resident uses.
Myers emphasized that if Issue 39 passes, it doesn’t mean
that the city will create an aggregation program, but that it can explore the
possibility.
“If we go to the market and we’re not seeing the savings, we
don’t have to do it,” he
No comments:
Post a Comment