The 50-49 party line vote shows the great controversy that
surrounds McNamee, who has worked for pro-fossil fuel think thanks and has made
hyperbolic negative statements about renewable energy.
Only one day after Cincinnati became
the 100th U.S. city to commit to 100% renewable energy, the U.S. Senate
confirmed Bernard McNamee as the third Republican on the Federal Energy
Regulatory Committee (FERC).
In an administration which has routinely appointed
individuals with strong ideological orientations and relatively few technical
qualifications to head federal agencies, the appointment of Bernard McNamee is
not inherently unusual.
Regardless, a
video discovered by UtilityDive showing McNamee’s outspoken positions
sparked significant controversy over his nomination, with both Senate Energy
and Natural Resources Committee Chair Lisa Murkowski (R) and Ranking Member
Maria Cantwell (D) mentioning this video before the committee’s vote to advance
his nomination.
According
to RTO Insider, the final vote that came down this afternoon was 50-49,
with all Democrats voting against McNamee. This includes Senator Joe Manchin
(D-West Virginia), who has been one of the greatest allies of the fossil fuel
industries in the Democratic Party.
FERC and renewable energy policy
The implications for renewable energy are clearly negative.
McNamee worked on the proposed bailout of coal and nuclear power plants when he
served under Secretary Perry at the U.S. Department of Energy, and could be
instrumental in setting market rules that favor these resources.
However, it is also important to note where FERC’s
jurisdiction begins and ends. As the regulator of wholesale energy markets,
FERC oversees grid operators in the Eastern and Midwestern United States as
well as the California Independent System Operator (CAISO).
However it does
not have direct jurisdiction over the Electric Reliability Council of Texas
(ERCOT) grid, and does not have the same kind of input on the electricity
system in the many regions that do not have wholesale electricity markets –
including much of the South, Mountain West and Pacific Northwest.
FERC also has jurisdiction over interstate transmission, and
over the
enforcement of the Public Utility Regulatory Power Act of 1978 (PURPA).
PURPA has been instrumental in the growth of utility-scale solar markets in
North Carolina, Utah and other states that do not have strong renewable energy
mandates, however in many cases PURPA implementation has been weakened at the
state level.
There is a potential for FERC to gut PURPA, and the
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) has
already called for state-level exemptions to the policy. However PURPA may
already be on the way out as a driver of utility-scale solar markets, such as
in North Carolina which has moved to a solicitation-based system.
No comments:
Post a Comment