President Donald Trump on Monday signed into law a military
spending authorization bill that includes a mandate to prepare and protect
bases from floods, storms and energy supply disruptions from climate change —
something Trump has said is a hoax. Adapting to climate change has been a
priority for military planners long before Trump’s election.
H.R. 5515, the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2019, includes language that directs the military branches
to include in every installation’s master plan an examination of “energy and
climate resilience.” That term is defined as “anticipation, preparation for,
and adaptation to utility disruptions and changing environmental conditions and
the ability to withstand, respond to, and recover rapidly from utility
disruptions while ensuring the sustainment of mission-critical
operations.”
The bill also directs the Defense Department to account for
flood risks before starting new construction — a move that will affect roughly
$10 billion per year in military construction spending, according to the Center for Climate and Security.
This new language, the first of its kind in a military
spending authorization bill, represents a big step forward for the military’s
efforts to prepare for climate change-induced storms, flooding and power
outages, according to Shana Udvardy, climate resilience analyst at
the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS).
“For the first time, it is defining energy and climate
resilience — that language is good,” she said. “It’s saying that the Defense
Department needs to look at changing environmental conditions — you have
to look at how we’re going to adapt."
While individual military bases have been installing
microgrids and preparing for storms and floods on a case-by-case basis for
years now, the new law requires every military base to take steps to
protect against these disasters as part of its master plan.
That’s important, because military bases across the country
are now threatened by rising seas and tidal flooding, said Udvardy. According
to a 2016 report from the UCS, 18 military installations on
the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts could face hundreds of floods a year and end up
being submerged by 2100. A three-foot sea level rise would threaten 128
U.S. military bases, valued at about $100 billion in property and
infrastructure.
Military bases are already facing floods due to
climate-change-induced weather, Udvardy noted. The U.S. Marine Corps facility
on Parris Island, South Carolina was flooded and lost power during 2016’s
Hurricane Matthew, while Naval Station Norfolk in Virginia experiences tidal
flooding on a regular basis.
Congress and the military have been working on these
challenges for some time, she noted. The defense authorization bill for fiscal
year 2018, passed last year in a bipartisan vote, included
language that characterizes climate change as a “direct threat” to national
security. It also included a mandate for the DOD to prepare a report on
the vulnerability of military installations to climate change, which is due to
be completed in December.
These preparatory moves will end up saving billions of
dollars, the UCC contends, by assuring that military bases either don’t build
in areas prone to the worst tidal flooding, or harden and elevate structures
that are built there to withstand “100-year” floods. According to a report from
the National Institute of Building Sciences, federal spending on “natural
hazard” preparedness and mitigation can yield an average $6 of value for every
$1 invested, Udvardy noted — a metric that doesn’t apply specifically to
military bases, but gives a rough sense of the value of preparing for climate
change.
As for energy security, the U.S. military is already the
country’s leader
in microgrid development, accounting for roughly one-third of U.S. capacity
expected through 2020, according
to GTM Research. Last year, assistant secretaries for the Army,
Navy and Air Force made the case for continuing
investments in military energy security — including the potential to
replace or augment the thousands of backup diesel generators now at bases with
more efficient and cleaner-fueled microgrids. The military is also expanding
base microgrids to surrounding communities to power critical infrastructure
such as hospitals and evacuation centers.
The military's focus on preparing for climate change has
continued in the Trump administration. According to the Center for Climate and Security, at least 16 different
top-ranking DOD officials, including Defense Secretary James Mattis, have
raised concerns or offered plans to address climate change in the past 18
months.
At the same time, the concept of improving energy security
and resilience for military bases is playing a role in the Trump
administration’s efforts to bail out money-losing coal and nuclear plants
across the country. That’s because the administration is planning to use the
Energy Department’s authority under the Defense Production Act of 1950 and
the Federal Power Act to force utilities to buy power from power plants
deemed to be critical to national security, according
to a memo leaked in June.
Power plants that serve military
bases are the most likely ones to end up on any list that may emerge
from DOE’s work on this still-unacknowledged plan. According to news
reports last week, Anthony Pugliese, chief of staff for the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, told a nuclear industry group that FERC is
working with DOE, DOD and the National Security Council to identify plants that
are critical to national security — an effort that could yield data that
informs whatever plan may emerge from DOE in the coming months.
No comments:
Post a Comment